The paper is interesting, but amateurish, or rather, analytically unprofessional. I would say that all the mistakes of the Armenia-2020 strategy are not only directly repeated, but also linearly distorted.
The paper is interesting, but amateurish, or rather, analytically unprofessional. I would say that all the mistakes of the Armenia-2020 strategy are not only directly repeated, but also linearly distorted.
As an international expert and professional in the field of agricultural crises, I would emphasize that when identifying priorities for the development of Armenia, the tendencies of the harmonious development of global humanity were not considered. The world does not change by itself, the world changes because people and the social community change.
Who are we? What can we give to the world? How do we want to live? What is our place as an ethnos in the “beard of egregors”? Not the answers to these and other similar questions, but the real approaches and knowledge of their solutions can raise us to the next level of development. The harmonious development of the community, where social initiative prevails, where morality is the basis, and the basis of morality is love – that is the main driving force of the national motivation.
But just as a productive seed cannot sprout in degraded, depleted, barren soil, likewise talent cannot be embodied in an unfavorable environment. Today we have the issue of a favorable environment, the issue of learning to live together, that of loving one’s neighbor as oneself, the issue of self-giving for one’s own sake. Today is the time to act.
